Download PDFOpen PDF in browserMotor Speech Planning Versus Programming in Apraxia of SpeechEasyChair Preprint 64363 pages•Date: August 27, 2021AbstractThe number of processes involved in the transformation of an abstract linguistic code into articulated speech varies across models. Some authors propose a one-step model between phonological encoding and articulation (e.g. “phonetic encoding” in Levelt., 1989) while others include two processes allowing the transformation of a linguistic code into a motor program (Guenther, 2016; Van der Merwe, 2020) sometimes called “motor speech planning” and “motor speech programming”. Apraxia of speech (AoS) involves impaired ability to retrieve and/or assemble the different elements of the phonetic plans (Blumstein, 1990; Code, 1998; Varley & Whiteside, 2001; Ziegler, 2008, 2009), and the impairment has been located at the motor speech planning processing stage. A different locus has been attributed to dysarthria, which underlying impairment has been located in the motor speech programming processing stage. There is however very limited empirical evidence in favor of two distinct processing stages transforming a linguistic (phonological) code into articulation. In the present study, we sought to target (a) motor speech planning via the comparison between the production of legal and illegal CCV clusters and (b) motor speech programming via the manipulation of uttering conditions. Four participants suffering from AoS following a left hemisphere stroke and four participants suffering from hypokinetic dysarthria (Parkinson’s disease – PD) participated in this study. They had to produce after a delay bisyllabic pseudo-words varying on the first syllable structure and legality (CV, legal CCV and illegal CCV). Keyphrases: Dysarthria, Motor speech planning, Motor speech programming, apraxia of speech
|